Curriculum Modules>
Contemporary Women's Movement in Ukraine: Comparative Perspectives

Session 2. Women’s political subjectivity and democratization processes in the cross-cultural dimension.

Butler, J. 1997. The Psychic Life of Power. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1997. (In English)

Zherebkina, I. 2001. “Feminist Theory of 90-th: Problematization of Woman’s Subjectivity,” in Introduction to Gender Studies. Vol.1, ed. by I. Zherebkina, 49-79. Kharkov, KCGS, St.Petersburg: Аleteya.

Popkova, L. 2001. “Theory and Practice of Contemporary Feminism: Women’s Movement in the USA,” in Introduction to Gender Studies. Vol.1, ed. by I.Zherebkina, 635-663. Kharkov, KCGS, St.Petersburg: Аleteya.

Scott, Joan. 2001. “Gender as a Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” in Introduction to Gender Studies. Vol. 2, ed. by S. Zherebkin, 405-36.Kharkov, KCGS, St. Petersburg: Аleteya.

Тyomkyna, A. 2001. “Woman’s Movement of the Second Wave: Sources, Conceptualization and Results,” in Introduction to Gender Studies, Vol.1, ed. by I. Zherebkina, 147-173. Kharkov, KCGS, St.Petersburg: Аleteya.

Ushakyn, S. 2001. “Political Theory of Feminism: Modern Debates,” in Introduction to Gender Studies, Vol.1, ed. by I.Zherebkina, 107-146. Kharkov, KCGS, St. Petersburg: Аleteya.

Tchikalova, I. 2001. “Gender Problematic in a Political Theory,” in Introduction to Gender Studies, ed. By I. Zherebkina, 80-106. Kharkov, KCGS, St. Petersburg: Аleteya.

Joan W. Scott. 1986. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” The American Historical Review 91(5):1053-1075. (In English)